I agree with you in most of what you wrote in regards to the defamatory charges. In my opinion the whole thing was a circus. It all came down to Depp having better attorneys and having that star power. But I believe both paties suffered from sone type of abuse, which makes it even.

Then quit making predictions. Base your predictions on fact and what's real. People should not make predictions or what they think especially if they are not judge or jury. Otherwise you have egg on your face. There's a real big difference between UK law and the United States county law. Taken in consideration juries in their personal biases. Take in consideration all these crocodile tears, the head bowing, sarcasm, and laughing during a serious court trial. You need to focus and ask if Amber Heard committed perjury? You need to focus on how is defamation considered when the person doesn't use the other person's name? Depp's evidence seems circumstantial in this trial. Focus on how was that Johnny was liable for what his stupid attorney, opening his mouth just like Amber Heard's attorney. Taking into consideration that juries are humans and they like Captain Jack Sparrow. Our legal system has taken a dump because of jury personification. You need to focus on the aftermath of the verdict like Amber heard's attorney still shooting her mouth off saying the reasons why Johnny Depp was not at the final verdict which to me is more defamation than this case. Amber Heard trying to say she was abuse after the verdict. she needs to shut her trap about Johnny Depp and her experiences whether true or not and needs to focus on helping women of domestic violence without mentioning Johnny Depp and getting another defamation suit on her. For me because of the evidence both parties were at fault. In this case both parties weren't hurting for money they didn't need each other they weren't like most domestic violence cases these people could have separated right away when the violence started. As for your predictions I knew you got it wrong in the last article you wrote, was it personal? Your ego on your latest article how the jury got it wrong twice? So what. This is the way most court trials go and it is what it is. Now it's time for people to drop it. Because the only thing I saw from everybody media, YouTube, social media during this Johnny Depp Amber Heard trial was egotistical people asserting their predictions and reasons. Besides Amber Heard can appeal.

Pssssshhhtttt, your opinion is neither desired, nor required . . . hahaha (Noxema Jackson).

Juries are definitely NOT legal scholars and can be swayed any which way and they were here. Depp had all the star power and it was felt in the courtroom. The women in the audience were giggling and the judge had to tell them all to remain silent or the room would emptied and I saw that twice. Even thei jury verdicts contradict one another and make no sense. They believed she was defamed, and awarded her damages but no punitive damages? That makes no sense at all.

This makes me sad. 🤑

This guy Danny is an absolute clown , obviously you only caught snippets of the trial . What ever your opinion is , I’ll never read it again !

I’ll check them out!

Check out, Hans J Massaquoi’s autobiography, Destined to Witness: Growing up Black in Nazi Germany. And, ‘Silence on Monte Sole’ by Jack Olsen.